« House Endorses Ethics | Main | Newsom Goes Guiliani This AM »

CA Evil Electorate Vote Proposed

A Republican lawyer is putting forth the Presidential Reform Act. It is a particularly stinky proposition that a man named Thomas Hiltchk wants to put on the ballot here in California. As you know, California has 55 electoral votes and we have moved up our primary has been moved to February 5 to allow us more say.

What Hiltchk is proposing is that two, yes, two electoral votes go to the popular vote winner and that the remaining 53 votes would be award to the Presidential winner of each congressional district. This means that California could decide the winner of the election and the outcome would almost guarantee a Republican president. UGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. Yes, because the last one has worked out oh so well.

On the plus side, it has to qualify to get on the ballot and then it has to pass. The part that bothers me the most? All of the time, money and energy that we will have to spend to defeat it.

You should know that Hiltchk is the general counsel for the Governator and that the Governator's office doesn't know anything about this proposed proposition. Right and that denial will buy me a home here in San Francisco. Thanks to Scaramouche for pointing this out to me.

Posted by Catherine on August 2, 2007
in Crooks, Current Affairs, Politics | Permalink| Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/238901/20550092

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA Evil Electorate Vote Proposed:

Comments

What's next - a proposal that would allow people born in Austria to run for President?

Posted by: Ann | Aug 3, 2007 8:41:51 AM

I blogged on this as well.

As I see it, the Republicans are going to have to tell "3 Big Lies" in order to sell this--all of which are easily debunked. Unfortunately, the Democrats are going to have to spend a bundle of cash to do the debunking.

Posted by: Kvatch | Aug 3, 2007 8:48:41 AM

They need to find better ways to spend their energy.

Posted by: catherine | Aug 3, 2007 9:26:20 AM

I saw this recently, and a while back, and it concerned me. The good side is I heard it might open up other red states to the same type of thing. However, as California is such a large electoral vote, this is bad, bad from where I sit. Not being out there, how likely would this be of passing or even getting to a ballot question?

Posted by: Scott | Aug 3, 2007 1:29:33 PM

Post a comment